TWO Nobel Prize winning experiments

[Quantum Antigravity]

                                                                     



“ This experiment is well worth trying.”
                 
—  Prof. Myron Evans,  B.Sc., Ph.D., D.Sc.     
                                           
                       
                         
TWO Nobel Prize winning experiments:

      https://quantumblabla/

[Daggi]

Evans' claims are not accepted by the mainstream physics community. In an editorial note in Foundations of Physics the Nobel laureate Gerard 't Hooft discussed the "revolutionary paradigm switch in theoretical physics" promised by ECE theory. He concluded that activities in the subject "have remained limited to personal web pages and are absent from the standard electronic archives, while no reference to ECE theory can be spotted in any of the peer reviewed scientific journals".

Several of the published contributions in this theory have been shown to be mathematically incorrect

http://www.mathematik.tu-darmstadt.de/~bruhn/MWEsErrors.html

http://www.mathematik.tu-darmstadt.de/~bruhn/GCUFT.html

[Quantum Antigravity]

Evans' claims are not accepted by the mainstream physics community. In an editorial note in Foundations of Physics the Nobel laureate Gerard 't Hooft discussed the "revolutionary paradigm switch in theoretical physics" promised by ECE theory. He concluded that activities in the subject "have remained limited to personal web pages and are absent from the standard electronic archives, while no reference to ECE theory can be spotted in any of the peer reviewed scientific journals".

Several of the published contributions in this theory have been shown to be mathematically incorrect

http://www.mathematik.tu-darmstadt.de/~bruhn/MWEsErrors.html

http://www.mathematik.tu-darmstadt.de/~bruhn/GCUFT.html

   

Daggi,
   
the only "Evans' claim" in respect to this topic
about the EXPERIMENTAL Quantum Antigravity hypothesis
is the following:

“ This experiment is well worth trying.”
 
Should I understand that if Evans says that this experiment is well worth trying,
then the mainstream physics community will reject offhand the possibility of performing it ?!   
   
 
“ Scientific discovery consists of seeing what everybody has seen,
and thinking what nobody else has thought. Scientific discovery must be,
by definition, at variance with existing knowledge. During my lifetime, I made two.
Both were rejected offhand by the Popes of that field of science.”
  —  Nobel Prize Laureate, 1937



The above two links you included refer to the ECE, and were last updated 21.03.2009.
The current Evans' theory is the ECE-2.   
   
     

The EXPERIMENTAL Quantum Antigravity hypothesis is not Evans' hypothesis,
and it has nothing to do with any of Evans' theories, or claims:

    https://quantenquatsch/
 



Daggi, your reply is OFF-TOPIC.   

[Peiresc]

“ Scientific discovery consists of seeing what everybody has seen,
and thinking what nobody else has thought. Scientific discovery must be,
by definition, at variance with existing knowledge. During my lifetime, I made two.
Both were rejected offhand by the Popes of that field of science.”
  —  Nobel Prize Laureate, 1937

They call it Galileo's Gambit.

The fact that some geniuses were laughed at does not imply that all who are laughed at are geniuses. They laughed at Columbus, they laughed at Fulton, they laughed at the Wright brothers. But they also laughed at Bozo the Clown.

er ... what's the name of this Laureate, please?
edit.
It was Albert Szent-Györgyi, it seems. Google was my friend.

[Daggi]

For all who understand German:

https://www.psiram.com/de/index.php/Galilei-Vergleich

and

https://www.psiram.com/de/index.php/Myron_Evans

sorry: no Wikipedia entry for Evans so far I can see. Is ECE now obsolete?

[Groucho]

edit.
It was Albert Szent-Györgyi, it seems. Google was my friend.

Mine to:
https://www.amazon.de/fehlentwickelte-Unf%C3%A4higkeit-Menschen-seinen-Problemen/dp/B0034579YI

Nobel-Desease.

[Quantum Antigravity]

The fact that some geniuses were laughed at does not imply that all who are laughed at are geniuses.

Of course, NOT all who are laughed at are geniuses.

Just me.

[Quantum Antigravity]

They laughed at Columbus, they laughed at Fulton, they laughed at the Wright brothers.
But they also laughed at these Homosexuell Clowns:  Daggi, Peiresc, Groucho

[/size]

[Peiresc]

@xxx

Your name isn't Kellyanne Conway, is it?

[Omikronn]

The fact that some geniuses were laughed at does not imply that all who are laughed at are geniuses.

Of course, NOT all who are laughed at are geniuses.

Just me.

They laughed at Columbus, they laughed at Fulton, they laughed at the Wright brothers.
But they also laughed at these Homosexuell Clowns:  Daggi, Peiresc, Groucho

[/size]

I see, you're mind is so bright that it enlightens cathedrals 

[oriol3s]

do you think Trump will get the nobel peace prize for NK peace?

[celsus]

do you think Trump will get the nobel peace prize for NK peace?

I think Kim Jong Un will.

[oriol3s]

 ^^ the orange one will get pissed

[Gethen]

^^ the orange one will get pissed

Errrm - why should he get pissed?

BTW: "get pissed" = get drunk / get sloshed / get shitfaced
"be pissed (off) = Queen Victoria: "We are not amused."

[pelbilkolm]

"pissed on" would also be an option, some say he would like that