Neuigkeiten:

Wiki * German blog * Problems? Please contact info at psiram dot com

Main Menu

Was gibts neues von Peter Duesberg ?

Postings reflect the private opinion of posters and are not official positions of Psiram - Foreneinträge sind private Meinungen der Forenmitglieder und entsprechen nicht unbedingt der Auffassung von Psiram

Begonnen von Deceptor, 16. September 2009, 19:32:11

« vorheriges - nächstes »

Deceptor

Neues von Peter Duesberg, Nobelpreisträger


Wer es nicht weiß: Med. Hypotheses, ist ein medizinisches Fachblatt in dem fast nach Belieben speukuliert werden darf. Aber eben nur fast.

----------------

Med Hypotheses. 2009 Jul 19. [Epub ahead of print]Click here to read Links
WITHDRAWN: HIV-AIDS hypothesis out of touch with South African AIDS - A new perspective.
Duesberg PH, Nicholson JM, Rasnick D, Fiala C, Bauer HH.

Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, Donner Laboratory, UC Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.

This Article-in-Press has been withdrawn pending the results of an investigation. The editorial policy of Medical Hypotheses makes it clear that the journal considers "radical, speculative, and non-mainstream scientific ideas", and articles will only be acceptable if they are "coherent and clearly expressed." However, we have received serious expressions of concern about the quality of this article, which contains highly controversial opinions about the causes of AIDS, opinions that could potentially be damaging to global public health. Concern has also been expressed that the article contains potentially libelous material. Given these important signals of concern, we judge it correct to investigate the circumstances in which this article came to be published online. When the investigation and review have been completed we will issue a further statement. Until that time, the article has been removed from all Elsevier databases. The Publisher apologizes for any inconvenience this may cause. The full Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal can be found at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/withdrawalpolicy.


PMID: 19619953 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]


Quelle: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19619953?ordinalpos=1&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_DefaultReportPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum

Gefunden bei Orac: http://scienceblogs.com/insolence/2009/09/pity_poor_peter_duesberg_even_medical_hy.php#more

Deceptor

Hier das urspüngliche abstract:

--------------

HIV-AIDS hypothesis out of touch with South African AIDS - A new perspective.

Med Hypotheses. 2009 Jul 18;

Authors: Duesberg PH, Nicholson JM, Rasnick D, Fiala C, Bauer HH

A recent study by Chigwedere et al., "Estimating the lost benefits of antiretroviral drug use in South Africa", claims that during the period from 2000 to 2005 about 330,000 South African AIDS-deaths were caused by the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) per year that could have been prevented by available anti-HIV drugs. The study blamed those who question the hypothesis that HIV is the cause of AIDS, particularly former South African President Thabo Mbeki and one of us, for not preventing these deaths by anti-HIV treatments such as the DNA chain-terminator AZT and the HIV DNA inhibitor Nevirapine. Here we ask, (1) What evidence exists for the huge losses of South African lives from HIV claimed by the Chigwedere study? (2) What evidence exists that South Africans would have benefited from anti-HIV drugs? We found that vital statistics from South Africa reported only 1 "HIV-death" per 1000 HIV antibody-positives per year (or 12,000 per 12 million HIV antibody-positives) between 2000 and 2005, whereas Chigwedere et al. estimated losses of around 330,000 lives from HIV per year. Moreover, the US Census Bureau and South Africa reported that the South African population had increased by 3 million during the period from 2000 to 2005 instead of suffering losses, growing from 44.5 to 47.5 million, even though 25% to 30% were positive for antibodies against HIV. A similar discrepancy was found between claims for a reportedly devastating HIV epidemic in Uganda and a simultaneous massive growth of the Ugandan population. Likewise, the total Sub-Saharan population doubled from 400 millions in 1980 to 800 millions in 2007 during the African HIV epidemics. We conclude that the claims that HIV has caused huge losses of African lives are unconfirmed and that HIV is not sufficient or even necessary to cause the previously known diseases, now called AIDS in the presence of antibody against HIV. Further we call into question the claim that HIV antibody-positives would benefit from anti-HIV drugs, because these drugs are inevitably toxic and because there is as yet no proof that HIV causes AIDS.
PMID: 19619953 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

---------------------------

cohen

Beim Ben Goldacre steht´s auch:
http://www.badscience.net/2009/09/medical-hypotheses-fails-the-aids-test/

Und auf Deutsch bei Unglauben.org:
http://www.unglauben.org/2385/peter-duesberg-hiv-fuhrt-nicht-zu-aids/

Die Kommentare bei bad science sind interessant. Dort taucht auch ein Redakteur des Schmierblattes auf.

Skrzypczajk

Ah, wollte es gerade posten. Das bei Ben Goldacre ist echt interessant.

inci

über diesen artikel bin ich heute gestolpert:

Gib AIDS keine Chance – weg mit dieser dreckigen Lüge!
http://tinyurl.com/ygoqnj9

die kommentare sprechen für sich, insbesondere die hypothese zur cholera.